Die WIPO hat ein 62-seitiges
"Trademarks and the Internet" veröffentlicht. Ein Teil davon
beschäftigt sich mit der Problematik des Keyword Advertising.
Angesprochen werden insbesondere
Fälle aus den USA (Nr. 19), der EU (Nr. 20), Großbritannien
(Nr. 29), Indien (Nr. 30), Israel (Nr. 32), Argentinien (Nr. 33) and
Australien (Nr. 35). Hinsichtlich China wird z.B. ausgeführt:
"In China, two
keyword advertising lawsuits, one initiated against Google China,
the other against Baidu, have yielded different outcomes. In Google
v Guangdong Ganyi Electrical Appliance Co Ltd, the plaintiff’s
registered trademark NEDFON was sold by Google as a keyword to a
competitor. The Court ruled that the competitor in question had
committed trademark infringement. However, Google itself was not
held jointly liable for trademark infringement. The Court determined
that, although use of a keyword to trigger sponsored links was a
form of advertising, Google neither had the ability to check or
control the information submitted by the competitor, nor did it have
an obligation to examine the legality of that information.
The Google case can be contrasted to the case of Baidu v Shanghai
Dazhong House-moving Logistics Co Ltd. Baidu’s bid ranking service
allowed Dazhong’s competitors to link their websites to the keywords
“Dazhong Banchang”. Here, the Court ordered Baidu to pay
compensation to Dazhong."